Skip to main content
Creating a better place

https://environmentagency.blog.gov.uk/2020/07/02/why-we-cut-the-grass-on-flood-defences-2/

Why we cut the grass on flood defences

Posted by: , Posted on: - Categories: Uncategorized

An image of grass being cut by EA staff

by Adam Bayliss

At this time of year you may see Environment Agency workers out and about cutting grass on embankments. When you see us you might wonder, is it really necessary? Especially when amongst the grass there may be pollinator friendly wildflowers and habitat for nesting birds. As the manager of a team that looks after flood defences in Yorkshire, I’m going to explain why we do this, the detailed planning behind it and how we’re always working to create a better place in everything we do.

Our flood defences come in a range of shapes and sizes. Some are large moving barriers (like the Thames Barrier), others are made of glass, steal or concrete and many are natural looking earth embankments. Often found in scenic locations, these embankments are great places to go for walk, spend time with friends and family and be close to nature.

What many people don’t realise is that the embankments are manmade – usually from clay, covered with soil and then grass – they help protect our villages, towns and cities from flooding during storm surges and times of high rainfall.

Just like any piece of engineering, they need regular maintenance to ensure they work when they need to. Some of our most important defences are our flood storage reservoirs, each one holds more than 25,000 tonnes of water. Maintenance of these reservoirs has to be done to a high standard because the consequence of the embankment failing could potentially put people’s lives at risk and result in flooded communities. Grass has to be kept short on the banks to ensure it forms dense grass sods. These create a consistent root network, making the banks more resilient to erosion from waves, over topping and heavy rain.

Dense sods are just one part of it. Keeping the grass short means we can monitor it for defects - often an early warning sign of something more significant. Shorter vegetation also discourages vermin from digging into the bank. Embankments with badger or rabbit warrens in them leak like a sieve, meaning they can collapse when water runs through them.

I know that for some people the sight of swathes of grass being cut can be distressing, especially when you take into account pollinators and nesting birds, so I wanted to assure you that it’s not an activity we do lightly. All our engineering and maintenance is guided by independent research and best practice borne out of a number of independent reports over the years. We have team of biodiversity specialists whose role it is to advise throughout the year on the best time to carry out our maintenance work.

When carrying out the work we use specialist industrial mowers which are quieter than domestic lawn mowers. Before mowing the machine operator will walk over the site to try and identify any nesting birds or other habitat or hazards. Our staff are diligent and will stop work if they see something of interest to get further advice.

It’s not all cut cut cut though. Across the country we work closely with organisations to create biodiversity. Here are just a few examples of the work that’s taking place in Yorkshire.

  • Working with Sheffield and Rotherham Wildlife Trust we have funded the planting of wildflowers and 50 trees on land behind a reservoir.
  • We’ve worked with the RSPB at Houghton reservoir on the River Dearne to plant 4ha of trees and 600m of hedgerows, the RSPB then planted a further 1ha of wet woodland to create a valuable wildlife resource.
  • With the Yorkshire Farming and Wildlife Partnership we’ve funded 2.hectares of trees and 370m of hedgerow.
  • This year we’ve planted over 16 hectares of trees and 1.7km of hedgerows in Yorkshire alone, and have done similar in 2019, 2018.
  • And as part of Defra’s national pollinator strategy to establish pollinator-friendly vegetation management, we have identified land that we own which we can seed with that will hopefully flourish into wildflower meadows.

Further afield, in south west London, work taking place on the River Hogsmill has seen trees and large branches - which could have caused a flood risk downstream - cut back and refitted into the river channel as deflectors. These deflectors slow the river and create a more meandering habitat perfect for invertebrates and other ecology. In Essex and Suffolk, on parts of the sea walls we delay cutting until the end of September to protect the active nests of rare bumblebees

The list of initiatives my team are working on to increase biodiversity is almost endless and this is being replicated across the country.

I hope this gives you an insight into why we maintain our flood embankments in the way we do and sheds some light on lots of the work you might not see.

If you want to find out more please follow us on twitter where you’ll find links to all the Environment Agency twitter account near you.

Sharing and comments

Share this page

5 comments

  1. Comment by Helena Smalman-Smith posted on

    That's really interesting, thank you! P.S. I think you mean "steel" not "steal" 🙂

    Reply
    • Replies to Helena Smalman-Smith>

      Comment by Adam Bayliss posted on

      Thanks for taking the time to read it and glad you liked it. I knew i'd make at least one error!

      Reply
  2. Comment by Ray Walton posted on

    Hi Adam..all sounds good as usual...so nothing to do with legal and illegal Water and Sewage Company discharged 'Raw Sewage' and 'Hazardous Waste' debris (ie: toilet paper, nappy liners, contraceptives, sanitary towels, condoms, sharps etc). being caught up in the grass, riverbank vegetation and overhanging trees, thus exposing the dire EA/Govt legalised situation to the public and river users including anglers, swimmers, boaters etc. putting everyone at risk of disease and contamination and infection. It is becoming common knowledge that this is the real reason, so you don't need to hide it anymore...I like the wild flowers though but you need to stop the mass felling of Riverbank healthy trees and mass vegetation clearance in the guise and reasoning for 'Flood Defence' which is now proven by yourselves and others to be flawed and out of date. Best Regards... Ray Walton

    Reply
    • Replies to Ray Walton>

      Comment by Adam Bayliss posted on

      Hi Ray,

      In Yorkshire we have about 1200km of engineered earth embankment last time I checked and I manage a decent chunk of these. I can honestly say that we maintain the embankments for the reasons set out in the blog.

      We all work off independent research that supports the grass cutting which is primarily in the CIRIA Report 116 and the British Dams Society guidance (although there is a lot more). This report talks about the impact long and unmaintained grass has on embankment stability particularly in overtopping events, which is when they're most vulnerable.

      Certainly in my area we don't undertake 'mass felling' of tree's on riverbanks, we undertake an Environmental Action Plan (EAP) which includes colleagues from our biodiversity team, external contractors and frequently independent specialists, to remove tree's we must justify each one and all be in agreement giving it formal sign-off. In addition to this each year we undertake a mitigation which involves fresh tree planting, environmental enhancements etc.

      If you have specific concerns about maintenance standards in your area i'd recommend getting intouch with your local Asset Performance Team and speaking to them about it. I'm (and colleagues) are always open to discussion on why we do things certain ways.

      Regards,

      Adam

      Reply
  3. Comment by Dean posted on

    This is an interesting and useful read. One thing stuck out though - it doesn't seem appropriate to refer to the animals that try to burrow into riverbanks as 'vermin', seeing as many of these creatures are suffering from habitat degredation. The actions you take to check the banks indicate care for them, but the use of this term suggests a negative attitude rather than one of care and management.

    Reply

Leave a comment

We only ask for your email address so we know you're a real person

By submitting a comment you understand it may be published on this public website. Please read our privacy notice to see how the GOV.UK blogging platform handles your information.