Skip to main content
Creating a better place

The Environment Agency Pension Fund goes net zero

Posted by: , Posted on: - Categories: Climate change

woodland with bluebells

by Marion Maloney, Head of Responsible Investment & Governance for the Environment Agency Pension Fund

Here’s something you may not know. The Environment Agency has a world-leading pension fund.

And now we want to go further. We want to halve the emissions from the over 2,000 companies we invest in by 2030 to get to net zero by 2045.

Before I tell you why this is important, let me give some background.

The Environment Agency Pension Fund is funded by employer and employee contributions. We’re part of the Local Government Pension Scheme, have around 39,000 members and assets of just over £4 billion.  We invest in these assets to generate the returns we need to pay pensions in the long-term.

Our approach has been based on a long-standing commitment to invest in products that are good for the environment and society while also ensuring competitive financial returns - an approach that has generated a healthy return. As of December 2020, our funding level was 107%, meaning that our current assets are greater than our future liabilities.

Climate change presents a significant financial risk to us, and indeed all investors. We don’t want to be invested in companies that are not ready to align to new policies or regulations to help reduce global emissions.  We don’t want to be invested in companies that are not resilient to the changing climate.

But climate change also presents investment opportunities - the opportunity to invest in products that produce less carbon, use less energy or help society manage weather-related events such as wildfires and power disruptions.

These risks and opportunities form the basis of the Environment Agency Pension Fund's new net zero policy. Based on climate data, we have an investment strategy to get to net zero by 2045 with interim steps along the way. We have an approach to help ensure our investments are resilient to a changing climate and in turn help society adapt to climate change.  And we do this in a way that at all times considers the best long-term interests of our members and the need to secure the provision of their pension.


Our pension pot of £4 billion may sound a lot of money but there’s an estimated £3 trillion invested in UK pension funds - that’s £3,000,000,000,000.   Investors are increasingly aware of the need to  account for environmental and societal issues in their investments. This ties into the government's Green Finance Strategy to green financial systems, mobilise finance for clean and resilient growth, and capture the resulting opportunities for UK firms.

But back to our Fund and three stats I want to leave you with.

92% of our pension fund members who took part in an engagement event last summer thought it was important that we had a net zero target. I suspect they said this for primarily environmental reasons but we’re also doing this for financial reasons – this is in the best long-term interest of the fund.

We’ve reduced carbon emissions from our listed equity portfolio by 74% over the last ten years. At the same time the value of these investments have risen by 94% to £1.25bn. Our Fund shows that you don’t have to compromise on return.

And finally how can I justify saying at the beginning of this article that our fund is world-leading? We’ve been chosen by the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment as one of the global leaders on responsible investment for the past 2 years running.

Deciding where your money is invested is one of the most powerful actions you can take to address climate change.  So what are you waiting for – check your finances today!

Sharing and comments

Share this page


  1. Comment by Kerri White posted on

    Surely you could become Net Zero before 2045 if you have reduced by 74% in 10 years you have just 26% to achieve so if you push it why not in 5 years rather than the 24years to 2045.
    I think as you are representing the ENVIRONMENT agency your targets should be pushed to show the rest of the world how they could do it if they only tried.
    If you want to really impress get Net Zero by 2026 your target of 2045 sounds like an excuse.

  2. Comment by Ian posted on

    I am yet to see any compelling evidence that man-made CO2 has any impact on climate. CO2 is about 0.04 per cent of the earth's atmospheric gases, and is very low at present. Of this 0.04 per cent we don't even know what tiny percentage is attributable to man's activity. This rush to "decarbonise" is as crazy as it is economically crippling. Our pension fund will be rendered net zero profit if it is invested in net zero CO2. The only people who will benefit are those running frauds like carbon trading and dodgy renewable energy investment portfolios.

  3. Comment by Vaughan Lewis posted on

    Just how much has the EA Pension Fund invested in Water Companies?
    What rate of return are we getting for this investment? An finally, does anyone think it is a good idea for the pension funds of staff who regulate these industries to invest in them, particualrly with their eye wateringly high rate of illegal dumping of sewage? Where is the real governance of our funds?

  4. Comment by Lawrence Breakspear posted on

    Does the Environmental Agency pension invest in water companies?


Leave a comment

We only ask for your email address so we know you're a real person

By submitting a comment you understand it may be published on this public website. Please read our privacy notice to see how the GOV.UK blogging platform handles your information.