By Helen Wakeham, Director of Water
World Rivers Day, celebrated every year on the fourth Sunday of September, is a global event that highlights the importance of rivers and the urgent need to protect them.
Public concern around pollution in England’s waterways has increased markedly in recent years, with the actions of water companies, and particularly pollution from storm overflow discharges receiving widespread attention. Today presents a good opportunity to not only take a look at the state of our rivers and what impacts them, but to explore what has already been achieved, and what needs to be done further to improve the situation.
Looking at the facts – where’s pollution coming from?
Earlier this week, I spoke at the Westminster Energy, Environment & Transport Forum’s policy conference on the next steps for tackling water pollution in England, where I discussed this topic.
The latest figures show that only 14% of rivers and lakes in England achieved ‘good ecological status’ – the criteria for good river health.
There are many factors that can impact the quality of rivers. Key contributors which meant waters didn’t achieve good ecological status include:
- The water industry, affecting 36% of water bodies. This is the impact of the water sector as a whole, so pollution caused by sewage treatment works and wastewater, including storm overflows.
- Diffuse farming pollution, which impacts 40% of water bodies. Farmers use nutrient rich materials to improve the quality of their soil for better growing. When it rains, these nutrients can be washed into our waterways.
- Urban and transport run-off, polluting 18% of our water bodies. This is when surface water picks up pollutants from our urban environment. This could be anything from litter, to petrol, to common garden pesticides. Just looking at vehicles alone, pollutants from oil spills and tyre and brake wear can be washed into rivers by rain.
- Abandoned metal mines, polluting 3% of water bodies. While metal mines played a major part in Britain’s history, water draining from abandoned metal mines, and the contaminated mine wastes left at the surface, continue to pollute our rivers and harm aquatic life.
Pollution can of course come from a variety of other sources, including PFAS – a very diverse group of chemicals which can be found in sewage, landfills, firefighting foam and some industrial processes.
What we’ve achieved so far:
Regulation
- Legislation has had a positive impact, such as the introduction of the Water Framework Directive in 2000 which enabled the setting of Environmental Quality Standards, and new permit limits for wastewater treatment. Pollutants that kill wildlife discharged by sewage treatment works, like ammonia – and toxic metals - copper, lead, cadmium, and mercury, are now greatly reduced, with 85% less ammonia discharged to the water environment than there was in 1990.
- We also regulate the agriculture sector by checking compliance with the Farming Rules for Water – we work alongside farmers to make sure they take reasonable precautions to minimise the risk of pollution from applications of nutrients to land and livestock management.
- Since 2021 we’ve undertaken more than 10,000 farm inspections and issued over 800 warning letters and site warnings, and 17,467 improvement actions to farmers.
Investment
- We’ve driven £30bn of investment in the environment through water bills since 1990, and there’ll be a further estimated £23bn in the next 5 years.
- The Water and Abandoned Metal Mines (WAMM) programme, our partnership with the Coal Authority and Defra, currently operates four successful mine water treatment schemes, improving water quality in more than 30km of rivers.
- A fifth scheme will start operating later in September 2024 - a nature-based solution which will significantly improve water quality in up to 60km of rivers in the South Tyne catchment.
Transparency
- We required the installation of Event Duration Monitoring a decade ago to provide the evidence for investment and regulation of storm overflows. As a result, all storm overflows are now monitored.
What’s the gap between the state of England’s water bodies today, and where we want to be?
In some ways the gap between where we are now and where we want to be in terms of water pollution is not as big as we might think. However, public interest in the health of our waterways has never been higher, and it can seem that the general perception is that the state of our rivers and waters is getting worse year-on-year.
But it’s important to put the increased knowledge and insights we now have about the water environment into context. For example, more storm overflow monitoring and transparency means there is a greater awareness and evidence of the problem rather than it just being water quality getting worse. This is not to say it isn’t a problem, but it’s not a new problem, and we now have the evidence to tackle it through regulation and investment.
The Centre for Ecology and Hydrology reports that river ecology has improved in the past 30 years. Again, it’s not a matter for celebration, but an indication that some of the interventions we have made as a society can and do work.
None of that is to belittle the size of the challenge we face.
Monitoring the water environment is a complicated and expensive business. And the more we look, the more we find. We can detect things now in our water environment that we couldn’t 30 years ago – and our definition of what good looks like has changed accordingly.
We know that to achieve clean and plentiful water we need action, ideas and innovation not just from the water industry, but from land managers, the transport industry, developers and urban decision markers– they all need investment and an appetite to tackle the issues.
Next steps
For the EA, we are transforming our water regulation, and welcoming new tools and enforcement through our Water Industry Regulation Transformation Programme (WIRTP) and the new Water Special Measures Bill.
The forthcoming review of the Water Framework Directive is a once in a generation opportunity to get it right. Let’s be open and transparent about the challenges ahead and bring other sectors properly into debate, working together to improve water quality.
2 comments
Comment by christopher shanks posted on
Why is the building industry, when given planning permission to build new urban housing and industry, not legally made to finance expansion of affected sewerage treatment plants to cope with extra effluent generated by expansion of housing ? I have lived in my area of dorset for 46 years and to my knowledge the sewerge treatment plant has not been updated in that time. The population has increased by 300 percent and still rising. The rivers are now not worth fishing as the fish populations have been decimated. They are the Dorset Stour and river Allen(which is an ssi chalk river) I live in Wimborne Minster.
Comment by Yolande Blackburn posted on
Why are water companies getting away with high levels of raw sewage still being discharged frequently into our rivers, how can they pay themselves huge bonuses when not investing in their business and destroying our rivers, the fines are insufficient, the checks against these companies are too few, the laws are not sufficient. Why should we pay increased bills to cover their lack of investment when the millions of profits and bonuses they have taken out year on year would have helped with this. This is business mismanagement, a lack of government oversight and control and as usual it is the end user who has to pay, along with the long term destruction of our rivers plant, fish and animal life linked to them. It is time to take a stronger stand on this, the plans you outline above are not enough....